May 24, 2006
Texas Ag Exports Could Feel Impacts of Immigration, High Energy Prices
Writer: Blair Fannin, (979) 845-2259,b-fannin@tamu.edu
Contact: Dr. Parr Rosson, (979) 845-3070,prosson@tamu.edu
COLLEGE STATION – Immigration reform and high energy prices could
impact revenue from Texas' agricultural export industry, a Texas
Cooperative Extension economist said.
More than $3.5 billion was generated from agricultural exports in 2004,
helping employ more than 90,000 workers statewide. But high fuel and labor
costs could cut profits, Dr. Parr Rosson said.
Meat processing and vegetable packing businesses are particularly
dependent on immigrant workers, he said.
"A lot of these jobs traditionally have been held by either first- or
second-generation immigrant workers," Rosson said. "And to the extent that
we go through a period where those workers are constrained and can't come
into the country, those businesses are going to experience higher costs
because they will have to pay higher wages to attract other workers. That
certainly would affect the competitiveness of the export industry."
At the Texas Ag Forum in San Antonio recently, John McClung, president
of the Texas Produce Association, said, "We can't operate without the
labor base we have now. We need a guest worker program."
Long-term high fuel and fertilizer prices could also affect revenues,
leading to higher-priced products, "particularly processed goods," Rosson
said.
"In terms of bulk commodities, it would be difficult to say if we'd
lose our competitiveness, but we may go through a period of time where
those products would face additional competition internationally that they
don't (currently) face because of higher energy costs," he said.
Not only will producing the commodities on the farm cost more, Rosson
said, moving them to the market place will be more expensive, whether
domestically or to a port facility for exporting.
"That will all take a toll," he said.
To help offset the potential high production costs, the economies of
many foreign countries continue to grow, which will increase export
demand.
"We're seeing some resumption of growth in Japan and other Asian
markets," Rosson said. "Korea and China are growing. We've seen a pick up
in economic growth in the European Union and seeing a pick up in Latin
America. That's certainly good news from a standpoint of export
potential."
Exports of agricultural goods produced in the U.S. is big business.
About $10 billion in agricultural exports are marketed to Canada annually,
followed by Mexico, which receives nearly $9 billion, Rosson said.
Mexico initially was a bulk commodity market, but now receives
shipments of boxed beef and poultry products, especially frozen foods, as
well as U.S. beverages such as wine and beer.
"It's become a wide-based consumer market," Rosson said. "What's become
important is with the experienced decline of Asian markets, we've seen no
big drop off. As a result, Mexico and Canada have picked up the slack.
Exports have increased."
Over the past decade, agricultural exports to Mexico has grown due to
U.S. grocery retailers establishing a marketplace. HEB entered the market
in the 1990s, and Wal-Mart has aggressively expanded its stake with
supercenters throughout the country, Rosson said.
"The Mexican retail business has also adjusted to compete with those
efforts, which is good news for U.S. agriculture products," Rosson said.
"It's created additional demand that wasn't there before."
China is also an important export market. In 2005, the country became
the fifth-largest export market. China is a large holder of U.S. debt
securities ($281 billion), next to Japan ($694 billion), providing a large
supply of capital to spark economic growth, Rosson said.
"(China as a big export market) is a welcome development," he said.
"Because exports had not been growing at very rapid pace last year, China
was able to turn that around."
Cotton, oil grains and oil seeds are a few of the leading commodities
exported to China.
"While beef sales haven't been important to this point, there's a lot
of optimism with the population base in China growing," Rosson said. "As
their economy grows, it's anticipated that it will help develop a larger
urban population. With that, our exports of beef to China will begin to
pick up significantly."
With the 2002 Farm Bill scheduled to expire in 2007, new farm
legislation will weigh heavily on the U.S. agricultural export industry.
One of the key issues is how policymakers will change the current farm
program to comply with World Trade Organization rules.
"In particular, what will be looked at closely is which of our programs
will be compliant and changed to adjust to any rules that come out of
WTO," Rosson said. "Because of that, we're going to go through a period
where we're not real sure if we will have a new farm bill next year, or
wait until after the WTO negotiations are concluded.
"Nobody knows right now. They've missed a deadline in late April. As a
result of that, it's thrown more uncertainty than existed before."
One of the changes will deal with export credit guarantees, Rosson
said. When Brazil won a 2005 ruling that found U.S. cotton subsidies
created unfair trade practices. Export credit guarantees were also
affected.
U.S. companies had been extending export credit to foreign buyers,
which enhanced demand for domestic agricultural products, Rosson said.
"As a result of that case, those (subsidy) programs are going to have
to change," he said. "We're not going to be able to extend export credit
guarantees for up to three years, for example. Those are going to have be
cut back to three months."
The U.S. Department of Agriculture has already implemented regulatory
changes, and those will be reflected in a new farm bill, Rosson said.
Marketing loan programs are also likely to be modified, he said.
-30-
|