June 12, 2006
Fort Hood Ponds being Surveyed
Writer: Edith A. Chenault, (979) 845-2886,e-chenault1@tamu.edu
Contact: Jason McAlister, (254) 774-6028,mcalister@brc.tamu.edu
TEMPLE – For Jason McAlister, charting unknown waters is part of his
day-to-day routine.
Armed with a two-man pontoon boat, laptop computer, sonar and global
positioning system equipment, the Texas Agricultural Experiment Station
research assistant is conducting bathymetric surveys of the 27 sediment
retention ponds on Fort Hood.
Bathymetry is measuring the water depth relative to some benchmark. In
other words, researchers are mapping underwater what would be seen on land
in terms of topography, such as the elevation and contours, McAlister
said.
"We are surveying the underwater landscape of these ponds without
getting our feet wet," he said, "although sometimes that happens anyway."
He and other researchers at the Texas A&M University System's Blackland
Research and Extension Center in Temple have been contracted by land
managers at Fort Hood – through the Natural Resources Conservation Service
– to determine the current holding capacity of the ponds.
The land managers at Fort Hood, or Integrated Training Area Management,
want to know if the sediment retention ponds are silted in; if so, to what
degree, McAlister said.
The conservation services constructed most of the ponds in the 1990s to
capture sediment-laden storm-water runoff that might otherwise wash off
the base because of maneuvering of trucks, light armor and tanks.
Fort Hood is on the watershed for Lake Belton, which supplies Fort
Hood, Killeen, Temple, Belton and other communities. Comparison of
satellite photographs from 1995 until 2000 shows substantial delta
formation at the confluence of Fort Hood's Cowhouse Creek and Lake Belton.
Since 2004, McAlister has been doing these surveys by using remote
sensing techniques and calculating the decrease in capacity in the ponds.
Remote sensing is "the science of acquiring information without direct
physical contact – touching what you can't actually touch or seeing what
you can't actually see by some other method," he said.
"It's good data to have," he said. "These are pretty costly structures
and they need to be maintained. You need to have an idea of what their
current functional health is."
McAlister's work is related to the ancient practice of sounding, or
taking measurements of water depth by sinking a piece of lead attached to
a line.
He started with a simple fish finder coupled to a global positioning
system unit, he said.
"We did it and proved that it could be done very efficiently, so we
upgraded our equipment," he said.
McAlister gathers data using sound navigation and ranging, or sonar, to
record elevation data, and a global positioning system to record location
data.
An electrical signal from the transmitter is converted to a sound wave
by a transducer, McAlister said. The sound wave is sent into the water,
and when the sound hits the bottom of the pond – or fish or debris in the
water – the sound bounces back. The echo hits the transducer which
converts it back to an electrical signal. The receiver amplifies the
signal and sends it to the laptop computer for display; the echogram is
"read" to distinguish what caused the signal to bounce back, he said.
The pond's bottom will send a continuous return signal, and a fish or
debris will send back a shallower, sporadic signal, he said.
Thousands of the georeferenced elevation points are collected and
paired with coordinates from the global positioning system receiver. From
that, a three-dimensional digital terrain model or topographic map is
created using geographic information systems, McAlister said.
Alternatives for the land managers at Fort Hood are few and expensive.
They could let the ponds fill with silt, rendering them ineffective. They
could dredge the ponds, build new ponds, or prevent as much sediment as
possible from getting into those that exist.
"Building any more (retention ponds) would impact the maneuver
capability" McAlister said. "You really have no choice but to go around
them."
The Experiment Station and Texas Water Resources Institute, in
cooperation with the conservation service, have been helping with the
fourth alternative: preventing more sediment from being washed into the
retention ponds and Lake Belton.
The conservation service has installed gully plugs, rock formations
across gullies that slow down the flow of sediment after rainfall.
Experiment Station researchers and Texas Cooperative Extension faculty
have applied excess compost from nearby dairies. That promotes the growth
of grasses and prevents soil from washing off the landscape in the first
place.
"The bathymetric survey of Fort Hood's sediment retention structures
from 2004 has given us a current capacity to compare to what the original
planned design was; therefore we can tell to what degree these ponds are
silted in," McAlister said. "As well, the current capacity data will be
compared to future surveys – like the one currently under way."
The surveys should give land managers an idea of how fast these ponds
accumulate sediment.
"This year's set of data will be of particular interest for comparing
to future datasets, in that a lot of effort has been spent implementing
erosion mitigating practices – gully plugs, contour ripping, and
compost/revegetation activities," McAlister said. "The 2006 survey will
set the stage for future analysis of the effectiveness of these management
practices slowing the sedimentation rates.
"The project benefits not only Fort Hood land managers to maintain
quality training lands for the soldiers, but also benefits the surrounding
communities in terms of water quality," he said.
-30-
|