Oct. 2, 2007
Sticking to Cactus Control Pays Off
Writer: Kay Ledbetter, 806-677-5608,skledbetter@ag.tamu.edu
Contact: J.F. Cadenhead, 940-552-9941,jcadenhe@ag.tamu.edu
CANYON – New products make controlling prickly pear and cholla cactus
a paying venture, as long as planned for on a long-term basis, a Texas
Cooperative Extension specialist said.
J.F. Cadenhead, Extension range specialist from Vernon, spoke recently
with producers about the second year of cactus control on a demonstration
plot of rangeland southwest of Canyon.
"We sprayed this in 2005 in the fall, and we see more work from the
chemical as the years go by," Cadenhead said.
The plot is an aerial test of the new Dow chemical called Surmount,
which is a mixture of Tordon 22K – the standard herbicide recommended for
cactus control – and a product called Vista, which was recently labeled
for rangeland use, he said.
The test also looked at a variety of surfactants to see if any of them
would provide equal or better effects than the standard diesel
oil-in-water carrier traditionally used in cactus spraying, Cadenhead
said. Surfactants are soap-like agents used with herbicide applications to
assist in spreading the herbicide droplets on the target plant for better
coverage, penetration and uptake by the leaf.
Compared to the standard surfactants, a methylated seed oil with an
organosilicone additive was also tested. This particular additive has 20
times the spreading power according to research, he said.
The treatments included applications of four-pints per acre versus
three-pint per acre rates of Surmount application with: crop oil
concentrate – about eight ounces per acre; diesel-in-water emulsion – 1-5
ratio; and non-ionic surfactant – two ounces per acre.
Using the four-pint rate per acre of Surmount, the results were:
– The treatment including diesel showed a 44 percent kill of all
prickly pear. Another 50 percent had more than half of the plant pads
dead.
– The treatment including the crop oil concentrate had a 60 percent
kill, with another 37 percent showing more than half top kill.
– The treatment including the non-ionic surfactant had a 46 percent
total kill, with an additional 39 percent more than half top kill.
Also included as a check was a test of the standard recommended rate of
Tordon 22K at two pints per acre rate with all three of the surfactants.
A final test included was a rate of three-pints-per-acre rate of
Surmount with three-ounces-per-acre rate of the methylated seed oil. It
showed 47 percent kill, with another 44 percent having more than half top
kill.
The highest degree of root kill on prickly pear was achieved with the
crop oil concentrate, rather than the standard diesel-in-water emulsion.
In this study, the three-pint-per-acre rate of Surmount looked as good as
the four-pint rate when both were used with the crop oil concentrate,
Cadenhead said.
Cholla is usually much more difficult to control than prickly pear, he
said. When it comes to treating the cholla cactus, the plant should be
knee high or shorter for best aerial control, he said. Anything taller
usually requires individual plant treatment for adequate control.
"We can see here even though we are not killing the cholla completely,
for two years we've kept them from blooming and forming seed," he said.
Herbicide costs for these treatments will be in the range of $25 to $30
per acre for the chemical alone, Cadenhead said. Spreading that out over a
10- to 12-year expected treatment life should make this practice pay for
itself.
"That first year, it's hard to show it is economical to treat that
rangeland," he said. "But over a period of time, the water previously used
by those cactus will go into forage production and you will see an
increase in grass production.
"Just remember, in treating cactus, you have to be patient," Cadenhead
said. "It generally takes two to three years to achieve the maximum
control with those herbicides."
-30-
|