April 16, 2007
High Cost of Nitrogen Calls For New Farming Strategies
Writer: Robert Burns, 903-834-6191,rd-burns@tamu.edu
Contacts: Dr. Jason Cleere, , (979) 845-6931,jjcleere@ag.tamu.edu
Dr. Ray Smith, 903-834-6191,g-smith@tamu.edu
Dr. Lloyd Nelson, 903-834-6191,lr-nelson@tamu.edu
Dr. Gerald Evers, 903-834-6191,g-evers@tamu.edu
Dr. Vincent Haby, 903-834-6191,v-haby@tamu.edu
Dr. Monte Rouquette, 903-834-6191,m-rouquette@tamu.edu
Dr. David D. Baltensperger, 979-845-3041,dbaltensperger@tamu.edu
OVERTON – Farmers can expect nitrogen fertilizer costs to be more than
50 cents per pound of nitrogen this year, said Texas Agricultural
Experiment Station and Texas Cooperative Extension experts.
What's driving the fertilizer costs higher? Several things, said Dr.
David D. Baltensperger, head of the Texas A&M University department of
soil and crop sciences.
"There are a lot of factors that always go into fertilizer prices,"
Baltensperger said. "Since the majority of our nitrogen fertilizer at
least comes from petroleum products, the price of petroleum drives
nitrogen fertilizer prices rather directly."
Baltensperger said that with fossil fuel prices remaining high relative
to what was seen two or three years ago, it's reasonable to expect higher
nitrogen prices this year. Another factor is the price of corn, and the
record number of acres being planted to supply grain for new ethanol
plants.
"Corn acreage ... is one of our big nitrogen users," he said. "And
consequently we'd expect to be paying the highest prices we've ever paid
for nitrogen on a national basis this coming spring."
Not all types of nitrogen fertilizer will be in the 50-cent-plus range,
Baltensperger said, but the ones most commonly used by East Texas
livestock operations will.
"Anhydrous (ammonia) will probably still be the cheapest source where
it is practical to use, but in many cases we have to use ammonium sulfate
or ammonia nitrate," he said. Probably all of the last three are going to
be in the 50-cent-plus category coming this year per pound of nitrogen."
With nitrogen costing this much, how can producers maintain production
without going in the red? In East Texas, the most critical economic crops
are improved summer forages, which require high rates of nitrogen for good
production. Experts from Extension and the Experiment Station – one beef
specialist, four forage researchers and a soils scientist – gave
suggestions on how to lower input costs and maintain profitable production
levels.
"We talk about in the future, coming up, how we are experiencing high
fertilizer prices now and what challenges it's going to have for the
cow/calf producer," said Dr. Jason Cleere, Extension beef specialist. "...
I think that one thing we have to evaluate ... is the stocking rate on
these pastures. We may not be able to be where we have been in the past.
We may have to adjust those stocking rates ... and think more on a basis
of per unit of land rather than producing as many calves as we can
produce."
Dr. Ray Smith, Experiment Station legume breeder and developer of
Apache arrowleaf clover, said winter legumes, because they fix nitrogen
from the air, can be part of the answer. The legumes require careful
management, however.
"One thing we can do to deal with the really high cost of nitrogen in
the future is we can add clover and other forage legumes into our pasture
systems," Smith said. "We do this generally by planting in the fall and
summer, but we need to make plans now in the spring and summer to both
soil test and to add lime into these systems so that we are ready for fall
planting.
Properly managed, clovers can add from 80 to 100 pounds of nitrogen per
acre to the soils, he said.
Dr. Lloyd Nelson, Experiment Station small grains breeder, has been
bullish about using over-seeding of annual ryegrass and other small grains
to offset the cost of buying hay and supplemental feeds in the past. With
current nitrogen prices, he's more reserved, he said.
"Whenever we do this (over-seed), we are going to have to put on quite
a bit of nitrogen to make them very productive. I think cattlemen are
going to have to look at that very closely and manage these small grains
and ryegrass so they can get the most forage out of them without putting
on too much nitrogen. It's going to be too expensive."
Dr. Vincent Haby, soil scientist with the Experiment Station, says the
easiest, cheapest cost saving management strategy is one that is often
overlooked.
"In fertilizing any forage grass, regardless of the prices of
fertilizer, a soil test is always advisable to have," he said. "Fertilize
based on that soil test. Also there are some crops that do not require
nitrogen. "
One of these crops that do not require nitrogen is alfalfa. It was once
thought that alfalfa could not be grown on most East Texas soils because
of their high acidity. Haby's research has shown otherwise; that with
careful attention to soil amendments, a large proportion of East Texas
soils are suitable for alfalfa production, he said. (See
http://agnews.tamu.edu/dailynews/stories/SOIL/Dec2204a.htm for more
information on growing alfalfa on East Texas soils.)
" Alfalfa is one of the options that are available," Haby said. "If you
have to put on phosphorus, do not split-apply if soil test is low. Get all
the phosphorus out there in the spring. It will be available through out
the growing season."
Dr. Gerald Evers, forage management expert with the Experiment Station,
said poultry litter is one option to cut costs.
"Particularly in East Texas, we can look at poultry litter as a source
of plant nutrients for pastures," Evers said. "It has many advantages:
It's a complete fertilizer, it has all nutrients in it, it has organic
matter and also helps improve soil quality. The disadvantages are that you
can't get it when you need it all the time and don't always know what
nutrients it contains. But it can be an option."
Dr. Monte Rouquette, Experiment station forage scientist, said offering
specific management recommendations is next to impossible because each
ranching and farming operation is different.
Also, individual producers have different expectations when it comes to
their operation's bottom line, said Rouquette, who studies how specific
livestock and forage species interact to effect production.
"I think the issue that we face with increased fertilizer prices it is
not just a single issue," he said. "It's caused us to be more aware and
more efficient in our planning of fertilizer, our planting of pastures,
and our planning with animals. ... Stocking rate becomes a problem or it
becomes an opportunity for us to make good utilization of all the forage
that we grow with the proper class of animal."
-30-
|